"lack of vocabulary" or "short of vocabulary"?

Discussion in 'English Only' started by t0y, Feb 1, 2009.

  1. t0y

    t0y Junior Member

    Orlando, FL
    Chinese-Mandarin
    hi there, I am not sure the usages of "lack" and "short"? Your suggestions are more than welcome. Thanks.
     
  2. pen22 Junior Member

    English - USA
    Lack implies that there is none there to start with; you're missing something. Short implies that they don't have enough. As for the example in your question, I would be much more inclined to say one has a "poor" vocabulary.
     
  3. Harry Batt

    Harry Batt Senior Member

    Minneapolis
    USA English
    I agree that "poor" is the better adjective because it does not raise the need to explain lack or short. For myself, lack of vocabulary would be a total shortage and, more important, the inordinate use of shortcuts such as, "you know, you know" or as in the movie Marty, "You ain't a dog." Short would indicate that there is a limitation in many areas of speech or writing.
     
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2009

Share This Page