Ilk is a higher register word. You won't find it in normal conversation.a. I hate you and people of your ilk.
b. I hate you and your ilk.![]()
Didn't know that. I thought it was a quite normal word. I mean, neither formal nor informal.Ilk is a higher register word.
Forgive me if I am wrong, but I think BLUEGLAZE means it's generally used when talking down to people in disdain, not in everyday conversations.Didn't know that. I thought it was a quite normal word. I mean, neither formal nor informal.![]()
May I know your idea about option (a), pops? You agree with MS Golightly or perhaps of a different opinion?Forgive me if I am wrong, but I think BLUEGLAZE means it's generally used when talking down to people in disdain, not in everyday conversations.
As far as I know the term has some sort of negative connotation with it (mainly used disapprovingly), then why isn't it fit for purpose?"Ilk" is reasonably common, but it doesn't really fit in an insult.
Does it really? So you mean that there is a negative connotation about the Scottish clan chiefs' use of "of that ilk".There is still something (shall we say discrepancy, or perhaps incongruity?) I don't quite get.
As far as I know the term has some sort of negative connotation with it (mainly used disapprovingly), then why isn't it fit for purpose?
What does this mean? What kind of people do you hate? Tall people? Blond people? Overweight people? People with the surname Peabody? Sailors? Blacksmiths? Some ethnic group? Citizens of some country? "Ilk" does not say. So it has no meaning. Maybe that is why I've never used the word, or heard the word.I hate you and people of your ilk.
It does in the U.S.Does it really?
It generally does in Britain too. "Of that ilk" is a very special use that few people who aren't from Scotland have heard of.It does in the U.S.
How very well put.What does this mean? What kind of people do you hate? Tall people? Blond people? Overweight people? People with the surname Peabody? Sailors? Blacksmiths? Some ethnic group? Citizens of some country? "Ilk" does not say. So it has no meaning.
The Scottish clan chiefs' use doesn't seem to have a negative connotation, but in the US I think it has a very faint negative or slightly facetious connotation that becomes stronger with a negative tone of voice or a more strongly negative context.Does it really? So you mean that there is a negative connotation about the Scottish clan chiefs' use of "of that ilk".
Of that Ilk - Wikipedia
Who are "their ilk"? They are not quack doctors (that is already in the phrase "quack doctors"). What people (that are not quack doctors) dupe people into believing that they can avoid Covid by drinking an elixir of brandy and kale juice?Quack doctors and their ilk dupe people into believing that they can avoid Covid by drinking an elixir of brandy and kale juice.
OED:Who are "their ilk"?
Ilk: C. n.
Originally: family, class, set, or lot, esp. in that ilk. Subsequently, in extended use and with other premodifiers: kind, sort.
1943 J. Kerouac Let. 7 Apr. in Sel. Lett. 1940–56 (1995) 59 I'm sure he's one of those prim, sparsely-hued ‘moderns’, who considers his ilk the backbone of the nation.
1968 H. S. Thompson Let. 24 Sept. in Fear & Loathing in Amer. (2000) 128 You and your swinish, hypocritical ilk.
1972 Life 1 Sept. 52/2 Ladies of every ilk.
2005 M. Atwood Penelopiad v. 19 Smaller fry, the table-tilters, the mediums, the channellers, people of that ilk.
I agree with Blueglaze at #2. If you use it, you are instantly putting yourself up as the listener's superior. Fisticuffs may ensue.a. I hate you and people of your ilk.
b. I hate you and your ilk.
Hi.
Do they both work for you?
The idea is that "and your ilk" is used when the person (in the given context) has been informed by your manner and/or word of the low esteem in which you hold them. Sort, type, and kind are close synonyms."Ilk" is reasonably common, but it doesn't really fit in an insult. Insults usually have to be simple and direct to be effective, and you don't want the other person to be left wondering what "and your ilk" is meant to mean.
In this hypothetical and unlikely scenario, bloggers, vloggers, and influencers on social media who claim to know secrets to good health.Who are "their ilk"? They are not quack doctors (that is already in the phrase "quack doctors"). What people (that are not quack doctors) dupe people into believing that they can avoid Covid by drinking an elixir of brandy and kale juice?
As regards the OED examples of Kerouac, Thompson, and Atwood (#18), their use of 'ilk' is not intrinsically derogatory, but it is used in a derogatory context. And I think that in the US (and apparently Canada, if 'Atwood' is Margaret Atwood) it's used that way: not derogatory per se, but not used outside of a context that's to some extent derogatory.I think we need to make a social distinction between:
________________________________________
- "Quack doctors and people of that ilk... a fairy godmother or someone of that ilk." Here the meaning is very clear and not intrinsically derogatory: it simply means "someone like that"; AND
- "You and people of your ilk." It is hard to see how this would not be insulting. To refer to a person in conversation as if they are merely one of a category, and a category which you do not even deign to name, is belittling. Said by a white person to a black person it calls for a formal complaint. The same proviso would go for "You and your people", as we have seen in a recent Buckingham Palace row*.
*NOTE: I believe that Lady Hussey may have meant "people" in the old upper-class sense of "parents", but she was still insufferably rude. The innocent insidiousness of "Where are you from?".
'You and your ilk' and 'you and your people' are very far from the same : if Susan Hussey had said 'you and your ilk' she would have actually deserved the abusive treatment she has received.The same proviso would go for "You and your people", as we have seen in a recent Buckingham Palace row*.