Yes, it is interesting to try and classify usage and of course this should be a key aim of the forum. But only through carefully articulated comments and observations based on evidence, not through unfounded generalisations such as the one cited.
In my opinion, homosexuals do not represent a 'language group'. Sexuality does not impact on usage and vocabulary in the way that nationality/ethnicity can. It is the generalisation that I object to. It would have been more accurate to note that use of the word 'bitch' is common usage in media representations of those in the 'gay community'.
Well then take my "citation" as "bitch is common usage in media representations of those in the 'gay community'".
I did not intend to mislead someone with that statement, and I don't think any sensible human being would actually believe that all male homosexuals use the word bicth in a non-offensive way. Wikipedia, as much as some might hate it, is actually a founded resource. The quantity of people that rely on it make it so.
Vocabulary IS indeed greatly impacted by one's sexuality, the same that it is impacted by one's age, geographic location, profession, lifestyle (include gay if you may), mood and many other subjective factors.
Again, if you feel uncomfortble with the way I made my post, feel free to interpret it in a way that pleases you most, or distresses you the least.
I did specified however, that those where not my own opinions but rather what I read in the mentioned article. Thus not making it a fact, as you said I did, but rather a point of reference.
This particular thread is not about correctness, or how "accurate" it is to use a word in a particular context, but rather how that word is perceived by different poeple, so any evidence as poor as it might seem is welcome and does contribute to better understand things.