Hello there, I've always been a little proud of my grammar, but this one is taking me down a few notches:
"This document emphasizes that efficiency in decision-making for the management of social services, and the regulatory framework governing them, are the main factors determining their performance, quality, and sustainability".
1) I feel like I need the comma in front of "and regulatory framework" because otherwise "efficiency in decision-making" would refer to mmt of soc. svcs AND the regulatory framework. Right, or wrong?
2) If I do need that comma, then should the verb afterwards be singular or plural ("is the main factor"/"are the main factors"). I really want to say "are", because, well, they ARE, but where, then, do I stand on subject-verb agreement? Might this be one of the exceptions that proves the rule?
Thanks so much for your urgent assistance!
"This document emphasizes that efficiency in decision-making for the management of social services, and the regulatory framework governing them, are the main factors determining their performance, quality, and sustainability".
1) I feel like I need the comma in front of "and regulatory framework" because otherwise "efficiency in decision-making" would refer to mmt of soc. svcs AND the regulatory framework. Right, or wrong?
2) If I do need that comma, then should the verb afterwards be singular or plural ("is the main factor"/"are the main factors"). I really want to say "are", because, well, they ARE, but where, then, do I stand on subject-verb agreement? Might this be one of the exceptions that proves the rule?
Thanks so much for your urgent assistance!