Hi,
I don't think "of the crime" is necessary. Also, just to be meticulous, the subjects should match, otherwise it isn't clear who you are talking about.
"If one aids and abets a criminal, one is also considered culpable."
Cheers Dimcl!
Celine,
In my day, we were taught that subjects should match. "She", "he", "it", "one" etc. are all variations on the 3rd pers. singular, so by switching to a different one in your second clause, it's as if you're introducing a new person or element into the sequence. In your sentence, I automatically read the "he" as referring to the criminal. I had to push a few buttons in my head to understand that "he" refers to the person "aiding and abetting"!
Maybe things have changed.. it was some time ago!
I agree with GEmatt changing midway in a sentence can lead to far too much confusion. After all "one" is sexless, "he" is male. Not all people concerned with aiding and abetting are likely to be male.
I also agree with Dimcl, "culpable" is a synonym of "responsible", which should be followed by "for".
Isn't it pleasant when we all agree?
Depends how old your grammar book is.
Go back thirty years (maybe more) and 'one' and 'he' would have been interchangeable as a general reference to 'people'.
Indeed it is, so I'm sorry to spoil the concord.[...]
I also agree with Dimcl, "culpable" is a synonym of "responsible", which should be followed by "for".
Isn't it pleasant when we all agree?