Hindi, Urdu: "mine" (possessive pronouns)

Pokeflute

Pokeflute

Senior Member
English - American
In English we can use "mine" (/yours/his/hers/etc.) as a pronoun. For example:

- Your house is bigger than mine (i.e. my house)
- Put more food on mine, please (i.e. my plate)
- I transferred money from your account to mine (i.e. my account)
- We each had a dog, and mine ran faster than his (i.e. my/his dog)

If I said "tumhaara ghar mere se baRa hai", it'd mean "your house is bigger than me". (i.e. "mere se" would be interpreted as "mujhse")

So then, how would I translate these into Hindi/Urdu? (My guess is perhaps "tumhaara ghar mere waale se baRaa hai"?)
 
    • Your house is bigger than me

    tumhaaraa ghar mujh se baRaa hai

    Your house is bigger than my house

    tumhaaraa ghar mere ghar se baRaa hai

    Your house is bigger than mine

    tumhaaraa ghar mere se baRaa hai
     
    Oh interesting. Would the following be correct then?

    maamlaa khatam karne ke liye, ham donoN ne apne dostoN ko maidaan par bulaa liyaa. res shuruu huii aur ant meN mere dost uske khilaaf jiit gaye.

    To settle the matter, we each called our friends onto the field. The race began and, in the end, my friends beat his.
     
    Pokeflute said:
    Oh interesting. Would the following be correct then?
    Click to expand...

    No; in Hindi, we don't use such a construction so much as in English.

    Pokeflute said:
    maamlaa khatam karne ke liye, ham donoN ne apne dostoN ko maidaan par bulaa liyaa. res shuruu huii aur ant meN mere dost uske khilaaf jiit gaye.

    To settle the matter, we each called our friends onto the field. The race began and, in the end, my friends beat his.
    Click to expand...

    kissaa/m(u)aamlaa nibTaane/nipTaane ke liye, ham meN se har ek ne apne-apne dostoN ko maidaan (par) bulaa liyaa. dauR/res shuruu huii, aur ant meN mere dostoN ne uske dostoN ko (or just unhe) haraa diyaa.
     
    I see - many corrections then 🥲

    Thank you both, this is interesting. So it is possible to say "mere se" (meaning, forex, "mere ghar se"), but the construction is not used as much.
     
    littlepond said:
    In that type of sentence, you could also have said "uske se," "unke se," etc. (standing for his/her house, their house, etc.)
    Click to expand...
    This is the grammatical correct construction (with mujh) and I would personally recommend that you use it. You ought to say, “ mujh se puuchho” rather than “mere se puuchho” but it’s your choice.
     
    Pokeflute said:
    Oh interesting. Would the following be correct then?

    maamlaa khatam karne ke liye, ham donoN ne apne dostoN ko maidaan par bulaa liyaa. res shuruu huii aur ant meN mere dost uske khilaaf jiit gaye.

    To settle the matter, we each called our friends onto the field. The race began and, in the end, my friends beat his.
    Click to expand...
    Sorry I am using my phone and I am not very good at selecting the appropriate sections for reply.

    “mere dost us ke xilaaf jiit ga’e” would mean “my friends won against him/her”! We would have to say… “us ke dosoN ke xilaaf”. I would also have used “maidaan meN” as well as “shuruu3”, “aaxir”.

    Finally, I would like to add that when a response is given by more than one person to a query, it doesn’t necessarily mean only one answer is correct. The correct answer can be expressed in different ways in the manner a cat be skinned in more than one way! Having said this, I have no experience whatsoever in skinning cats🥹
     
    Last edited:
    littlepond said:
    In that type of sentence, you could also have said "uske se," "unke se," etc. (standing for his/her house, their house, etc.)
    Click to expand...
    I’ve been thinking about this. Theoretically “un ke ko” may be correct but it does sound rather weird. Let’s see if anyone else makes a comment on this.
     
    Qureshpor said:
    This is the grammatical correct construction (with mujh) and I would personally recommend that you use it. You ought to say, “ mujh se puuchho” rather than “mere se puuchho” but it’s your choice.
    Click to expand...

    @Qureshpor jii, I did not understand to what this was referring to. I agree wholeheartedly with you that "mujh se puuchho" is the grammatically correct sentence, and I don't think I said anything else anywhere on this thread.
     
    littlepond said:
    @Qureshpor jii, I did not understand to what this was referring to. I agree wholeheartedly with you that "mujh se puuchho" is the grammatically correct sentence, and I don't think I said anything else anywhere on this thread.
    Click to expand...
    No you didn’t say anything else anywhere. My response was meant for @Pokeflute’s #5. I have inadvertently quoted your response. Apologies.
     
    Pokeflute said:
    In English we can use "mine" (/yours/his/hers/etc.) as a pronoun. For example:

    - Your house is bigger than mine (i.e. my house)
    - Put more food on mine, please (i.e. my plate)
    - I transferred money from your account to mine (i.e. my account)
    - We each had a dog, and mine ran faster than his (i.e. my/his dog)

    If I said "tumhaara ghar mere se baRa hai", it'd mean "your house is bigger than me". (i.e. "mere se" would be interpreted as "mujhse")

    So then, how would I translate these into Hindi/Urdu? (My guess is perhaps "tumhaara ghar mere waale se baRaa hai"?)
    Click to expand...
    I believe that in your question you are conflating two doubts that are not (IMO) necessarily related.

    One, if there are "apocopated versus non-apocopated" versions for the possessives in HU. I am pretty sure that the answer for that is no. The formative of the pronouns does not fulfill that function.

    Two, if the (supposedly non apocopated version) would be used to qualify things in a way the -vaalaa suffix does (i.e., "having that characteristic" such as "being mine" to the exclusion of others not having that characteristic). Since the answer to the first question is no, this second question is moot.

    That said, I see no reason why "meraa vaalaa" or "mere vaale se" would not be used, in case you wanted to specify possession for something to the exclusion of other things. In other words, I see nothing wrong with "tumhaara ghar mere waale se baRaa hai". But on that I submit to the respected contributors above.
     
    MonsieurGonzalito said:
    That said, I see no reason why "meraa vaalaa" or "mere vaale se" would not be used, in case you wanted to specify possession for something to the exclusion of other things. In other words, I see nothing wrong with "tumhaara ghar mere waale se baRaa hai". But on that I submit to the respected contributors above.
    Click to expand...
    The “vaalaa” version is quite common in speech but from an Urdu perspective, it is to be shunned. I feel it doesn’t really add anything and is redundant.
     
    I have three small additions :)

    First:
    littlepond said:
    we don't use such a construction so much as in English.
    Click to expand...
    I agree very much with this and feel that this comment is probably one of the most important things to be taken away from this discussion. To my ears, at least, even simple sentences like tumhaaraa ghar mere ghar se baRaa hai (with ghar repeated) don't sound particularly inelegant/redundant/etc in the same way that the corresponding English sentences do if the word "house" is repeated. In practice, I think this repetition is probably what I would both use and expect to hear most of the time [^1], even when an idiomatic English translation would not involve a repetition.

    Second: While I generally agree with the consensus above that tumhaaraa ghar mere se baRaa hai is "fine," I inhabit circles where the (prescriptively verboten) mujh_se → mere se substitution is very common in speech, so I strongly sympathize with the concern raised in the OP here:
    Pokeflute said:
    If I said "tumhaara ghar mere se baRa hai", it'd mean "your house is bigger than me". (i.e. "mere se" would be interpreted as "mujhse")
    Click to expand...
    That being said, I'd like to add that the colloquial oblique → genitive substitution witnessed in mujh_se → mere se is not stable across all person-numbers. In particular, I don't recall encountering the substitution us_se → us_ke se, so doing the comparison the other way and saying meraa ghar us_ke se chhoTaa hai doesn't seem to run into the same potential for ambiguity. (But this sentence too, I slightly prefer with a repeated ghar.)

    Third:
    Pokeflute said:
    res shuruu huii aur ant meN mere dost uske khilaaf jiit gaye.
    Click to expand...
    This is supposed to be a truncated version of "mere dost us_ke dostoN ke xilaaf...", so I presume you probably meant to write "mere dost us_ke ke xilaaf..."? (Or maybe we can even fully subtantivize and go with "mere dost us_koN ke xilaaf..." :)) Anyway, circling back to my first point, I entirely agree with @littlepond jii in #4 and @Qureshpor jii in #8 that attempting to drop the "possessee" in this sentence feels like a particularly "over-aggressive" application of this syntax.

    ---
    Footnote:

    [^1]: One sort of systematic exception to this that occurs to me at the moment is certain questions that end on the omitted words (eg: hamaaraa ghar baRaa hai yaa us_kaa? tere ghar chaleN yaa mere? kyaa aap sab X ke ghar se aa'o_ge yaa Y ke?). Here repetition does feel decidedly redundant.
     
    Last edited:
    aevynn said:
    Second: While I generally agree with the consensus above that tumhaaraa ghar mere se baRaa hai is "fine," I inhabit circles where the (prescriptively verboten) mujh_se → mere se substitution is very common in speech, so I strongly sympathize with the concern raised in the OP here:
    Click to expand...
    With jaisaa comparisons, the substitution of the formative with the possessive oblique is still "prescriptively verboten", or it has reached mainstream status? Do people often say mujh jaisaa, etc.?
     
    MonsieurGonzalito said:
    ... is still "prescriptively verboten", or it has reached mainstream status?
    Click to expand...
    These aren't mutually exclusive, are they? Lots of things are verboten to prescriptivists despite being commonplace in speech...

    MonsieurGonzalito said:
    Do people often say mujh jaisaa, etc.?
    Click to expand...
    Yes, people do often say this. According to this post, it might even be the prescriptively preferred form, but who knows...
     
    aevynn said:
    That being said, I'd like to add that the colloquial oblique → genitive substitution witnessed in mujh_se → mere se is not stable across all person-numbers
    Click to expand...
    Agreed - not to derail the thread but I've only really heard "mere se" and "tere se". (My pet theory is it's only the "ujh" oblique forms).


    littlepond said:
    In that type of sentence, you could also have said "uske se," "unke se," etc. (standing for his/her house, their house, etc.)
    Click to expand...

    Qureshpor said:
    I’ve been thinking about this. Theoretically “un ke ko” may be correct but it does sound rather weird. Let’s see if anyone else makes a comment on this.
    Click to expand...

    aevynn said:
    This is supposed to be a truncated version of "mere dost us_ke dostoN ke xilaaf...", so I presume you probably meant to write "mere dost us_ke ke xilaaf..."?
    Click to expand...

    Ah yes my bad - I see what you all mean. Applying the same pattern would yield using "uske + ke xilaaf/se/ko"

    aevynn said:
    I agree very much with this and feel that this comment is probably one of the most important things to be taken away from this discussion. To my ears, at least, even simple sentences like tumhaaraa ghar mere ghar se baRaa hai (with ghar repeated) don't sound particularly inelegant/redundant/etc in the same way that the corresponding English sentences do if the word "house" is repeated. In practice, I think this repetition is probably what I would both use and expect to hear most of the time [^1], even when an idiomatic English translation would not involve a repetition.
    Click to expand...

    Either way - seems like a pretty consistent takeaway (from you, Littlepond-ji, and Qureshpor-ji) that a literal translation from English is not the way to go here :)

    Thanks all!
     
    aevynn said:
    In particular, I don't recall encountering the substitution us_se → us_ke se, so doing the comparison the other way and saying meraa ghar us_ke se chhoTaa hai doesn't seem to run into the same potential for ambiguity. (But this sentence too, I slightly prefer with a repeated ghar.)

    Third:
    Click to expand...
    aevynn said:
    ---
    Footnote:

    [^1]: One sort of systematic exception to this that occurs to me at the moment is certain questions that end on the omitted words (eg: hamaaraa ghar baRaa hai yaa us_kaa? tere ghar chaleN yaa mere? kyaa aap sab X ke ghar se aa'o_ge yaa Y ke?). Here repetition does feel decidedly redundant.
    Click to expand...
    I am glad I wasn’t the only one who hadn’t come across “us ke se”.

    I would prefer to say…

    kyaa aap sab X ke ghar se aa’eN ge yaa Y ke.
     
    I was under the impression that separating a nominal head from the postposition that subordinates it, is something generally avoided by HU speakers. us_ke se
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.
    Back
    Top