From an employee's severance agreement:
The logic of these two sentences completely escapes me.
If the compensation is supposed to equal "(one) month's salary per year of employment", then why would it ever equal 24 months' salary??
I feel as though I must be missing something about the blue part, but I don't know what.
Your contributions are welcome.
Thanks,
Gavril
Hänelle maksetaan [...] kertakorvauksena työsuhteen päättymisen johdosta erorahaa [X] euroa, mikä vastaa hänen 24 kuukauden peruspalkkaansa.
Eroraha perustuu yhtiön henkilöstöohjelmaan, jonka mukaisesti korvaus on määrältään kuukauden palkka per palvelusvuosi (kuukauden palkka = peruspalkka + 1/12 lomarahasta), kuitenkin korkeintaan 24 kuukauden palkkaa vastaava korvaus.
The logic of these two sentences completely escapes me.
If the compensation is supposed to equal "(one) month's salary per year of employment", then why would it ever equal 24 months' salary??
I feel as though I must be missing something about the blue part, but I don't know what.
Your contributions are welcome.
Thanks,
Gavril