Yes, that strikes me as unusual too. If someone told me they wanted their trousers "cuffed", I would think that they wanted a folded up cuff added to their trousers.
I believe that many people ~ possibly most ~ would say "lengthened" or "shortened" when they are talking about trousers, as Copyright suggests. It is true that this may be accomplished by taking up (raising) or letting down (lowering) the hem, but I suspect that people are less likely to use these terms.
Would it be possible/correct to say "Could you let down my pants' hems"? "I would like to have my pants' hems let down"?But trousers can be hemmed with or without cuffs. You wouldn't have cuffs put on tuxedo slacks, for example.
I would use hemmed but I think I would say "hems" for pants/trousers.
Could you let down/take up the hems on these pants/trousers?
I have no idea how to sew anything. I am just reporting on the way I would say it as a customer. I would certainly understand your original question.
You can say "let down/lengthen the hem(s) on my pants/pant legs". It's usually not a good idea to let down hems. You can often see where the original hem was.Would it be possible/correct to say "Could you let down my pants' hems"? "I would like to have my pants' hems let down"?
I agree. Usually I have pants hemmed when I shop for them and can't find my length. I then order the nearest size that is longer than required and my tailor will hem them to the correct size.You can say "let down/lengthen the hem(s) on my pants/pant legs". It's usually not a good idea to let down hems. You can often see where the original hem was.
Very civilized of you. I wish tailors were more common these days. Clothes never look good in a "one size fits all Larges" cookie cutter design.I agree. Usually I have pants hemmed when I shop for them and can't find my length. I then order the nearest size that is longer than required and my tailor will hem them to the correct size.