Ought to vs should
- Thread starter Taniaa
- Start date
Opss... scusa Paul, intendevo Should not Could... scusatemi per la distrazione: colpa della tarda ora!!
Should è simile ad ought to: dovere al condizionale.
grammatica
Ciao Ibanez e benvenut@
Non c'è molta differenza tra i due termini, ma sarebbe meglio se ci dessi un po' di contesto.
Cosa significa "aggiungere del contesto"?
Hai per caso una frase intera?
Ti aspettiamo.
neuromatico
Moderatore
P.S. Ne approfitto per ricordarti l'uso corretto delle maiuscole, visto che siamo un Forum di lingue.
Linee guida del forum italiano-inglese
Regolamento integrale dei forum di WordReference
Non c'è molta differenza tra i due termini, ma sarebbe meglio se ci dessi un po' di contesto.
Cosa significa "aggiungere del contesto"?
Hai per caso una frase intera?
Ti aspettiamo.
neuromatico
Moderatore
P.S. Ne approfitto per ricordarti l'uso corretto delle maiuscole, visto che siamo un Forum di lingue.
Linee guida del forum italiano-inglese
Regolamento integrale dei forum di WordReference
In the United States we don't say "ought to" when speaking. We say, "should." I think "ought to" means the same thing, and it may still be used in other countries, but in America it would sound old-fashioned.
I can think of one difference: sometimes in English we use "should" when we really mean "must", usually in polite instructions: "Passengers with nothing to declare should go through the green exit". In these cases we wouldn't use "ought to".
For other uses I personally tend to say "should" rather than "ought to", but I've read in some text books that "ought to" is so old-fashioned that it's not worth teaching... That really is an exaggeration!
For other uses I personally tend to say "should" rather than "ought to", but I've read in some text books that "ought to" is so old-fashioned that it's not worth teaching... That really is an exaggeration!
Should means "advice"
Ought to means "moral obligation"
So there's a difference between them.....
"You should drive your car more slowly" -> I advice you to drive slowly: driving fast is dangerous, but this is my advice, if you want to keep on, it doesn't matter
"You ought to take care of your mother" -> You are obliged, your mother is your mother, don't let her alone, you can't do it, probably you mustn't
all the best
Ought to means "moral obligation"
So there's a difference between them.....
"You should drive your car more slowly" -> I advice you to drive slowly: driving fast is dangerous, but this is my advice, if you want to keep on, it doesn't matter
"You ought to take care of your mother" -> You are obliged, your mother is your mother, don't let her alone, you can't do it, probably you mustn't
all the best
Really thinking about it, I could probably agree with pigieffo, but in practice I consider the two forms as interchangeable.
Going back two years, a clarification should be made about post #11: I see "advice" has been corrected to "advise". In reality "advice" is the noun and "advise" is the verb (I've looked for AE/BE differences but they don't seem to exist on this point).
PS from a google search "take our advise" is outnumbered 4:1 by "take our advice". If "advise" as a noun were the standard American form I think it would outnumber "advice". Maybe an American can comment.
Going back two years, a clarification should be made about post #11: I see "advice" has been corrected to "advise". In reality "advice" is the noun and "advise" is the verb (I've looked for AE/BE differences but they don't seem to exist on this point).
PS from a google search "take our advise" is outnumbered 4:1 by "take our advice". If "advise" as a noun were the standard American form I think it would outnumber "advice". Maybe an American can comment.
Last edited:
An American comments: No difference as far as I can see Einstein.
advice - noun
advise - verb
advice - noun
advise - verb
Thank you for commenting, American!
I was thinking of practice/practise and licence/license where there are differences.
Ciao.
Tornando all'argomento principale (Ought to vs. Should), posso offrire un modesto contributo:
l'azione consigliata con "ought to" implica che la persona che offre il consiglio abbia a cuore il beneficio che risulta per chi la fa o per chi la subisce;
"you ought to remind him, he's probably forgotten you're waiting for an answer"
"we ought to book up now or we may end up not finding tickets"
l'azione consigliata con "should" può implicare un beneficio, ma è spesso del tutto imparziale e non tenta di valorizzare in nessun modo l'esito dell'azione;
"you should spend less time on Maths and devote more energy to Science"
"we shouldn't visit Aberdeen before spending a week in Edinburgh"
Questo è un tentativo di distinguere l'uso dei 2 ausiliari. Non so se ho ragione, magari è solo uno spunto per chi sa più di me.
kap
Tornando all'argomento principale (Ought to vs. Should), posso offrire un modesto contributo:
l'azione consigliata con "ought to" implica che la persona che offre il consiglio abbia a cuore il beneficio che risulta per chi la fa o per chi la subisce;
"you ought to remind him, he's probably forgotten you're waiting for an answer"
"we ought to book up now or we may end up not finding tickets"
l'azione consigliata con "should" può implicare un beneficio, ma è spesso del tutto imparziale e non tenta di valorizzare in nessun modo l'esito dell'azione;
"you should spend less time on Maths and devote more energy to Science"
"we shouldn't visit Aberdeen before spending a week in Edinburgh"
Questo è un tentativo di distinguere l'uso dei 2 ausiliari. Non so se ho ragione, magari è solo uno spunto per chi sa più di me.
kap