Did you see who was in the reception area? He was here last night as well.
Did you see who was in the reception area? He was here last night as well.
Did you edit your post, Shannon? I thought you had written, Did you see who was out there?, which is what most people would say in this situation.Did you see who was in the reception area? He was here last night as well.
Did you edit your post, Shannon? I thought you had written, Did you see who was out there?, which is what most people would say in this situation.![]()
grazie a tutti...mi sa che opto per among the spectators
I think "audience" is more appropriate than "spectators". An "audience" is used in the context of a theatre, whereas "spectators" more refers to sports, in my opinion.
Sorry ElfaA spectator is merely the member of an audience. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spectator?r=75&src=ref&ch=dic
A spectator is a member of an audience but in a theatre setting, in BE at least, "in the audience" would sound more natural than "among the spectators."![]()
I completely agree with you, Teerex. A spectator is a member of an audience but in a theatre setting, in BE at least, "in the audience" would sound more natural than "among the spectators."![]()
Well, fellows, Wikipedia suggests "parterre", maybe this could be a good choice.
In that case, I wouldn't use "pass" as to my mind this usually refers to people who have paid for a ticket but get a kind of free extra. How aboutThis kind of pass is intended for VIPs, so they have, basically. access to the auditorium for free (no backstage access for them), in a dedicated area which is the closest to the stage. It's another way for giving them a free ticket and to let them know that are important.....kind of marketing strategy
Or is that too wordy?