Mauricet
Senior Member
French - France
The context is a letter in Nature, "Organic-walled microfossils in 3.2-billion-year-old shallow-marine siliciclastic deposits". The abstract contains the following sentence:
Ambiguities and controversies persist regarding the biogenicity and syngeneity of the record older than Late Archaean.
The "record" here is made of would-be fossils. I understand that biogenicity refers to the fact that these fossils are (or not) remnants of living organisms, rather than morphologies resulting from non-biological physical processes. But what does syngeneity mean ?
Ambiguities and controversies persist regarding the biogenicity and syngeneity of the record older than Late Archaean.
The "record" here is made of would-be fossils. I understand that biogenicity refers to the fact that these fossils are (or not) remnants of living organisms, rather than morphologies resulting from non-biological physical processes. But what does syngeneity mean ?