Hi elroy, I need your opinion again. I hope you can help!
I thought I got it clear the other time, but when I tried to explain it to someone else, I could only find arguments for the opposite side again.
If I explain my thinking, would you please correct me if I'm wrong and explain why?
I'm not trying to be stuborn, just want to understand the rules correctly and so I can explain right as well to someone else.
So this is how I see it:
Adjectives describe (pro-)nouns.
Adverbs describe verbs and other non-(pro-)nouns.
Also, if it is an adverb, you should be able to put it in front of the verb and it would still make sence.
In "I am serious" or "the man is serious", why is here not an adverb used, when it describes how I AM and he IS, which are verbs? Because "serious" describes ME and THE MAN, which are (pro-)nouns and therefore an adjective needs to be used here. Does't matter if we ARE serious or TAKEN (perceived) serious, "serious" still describes the person, which is a (pro-)noun.
"I took it personal". If you use an adverb here and say "I took it personally", then "personally" means "in person" and not "to the person".
I took it personally, instead of sending a delegate. Here personally describes in which way you TOOK it. You personally (= in person) took it to the post office.
Here you can put it in front of the verb and it makes perfect sence.
I took IT personal and IT broke my heart. Here personal describes in which way you took IT. You took IT personal (= to the person) and got upset.
Here you cannot say, I personally took it, cause it would make no sence.
I'm taking HIM serious and I'm not taking HER serious. Him and her are replaceable and they are (pro-)nouns, therefore it is an adjective. I take him, them, it, the news, my studies serious.
If the verb was replaceable (and you can put it in front of it), then it would be an adverb. I'm seriously studying, talking, singing, etc.
He is (being) serious.
He is taken (being) serious.
She is (being) personal.
She is taken (being) personal.