the quantity when the number is not 1

[wayoutwest888]

things below are pretty confusing, pls tell me if i'm right, thank you

i'd say something like this:
1.1 hours/meters, 0.87 hours/meters, 1/2 hours/meters

 

[Matching Mole]

Anything greater than one is treated as plural, even if it is less than two, so 1.1 hours is correct, and so is "one and one tenth hours". A decimal fraction is treated as plural unless "of" is used, so "point eight seven hours" is correct, but it is "point eight seven of an hour". Fractions such as half, one third, etc. take the singular: half a mile; a half hour; one third of a metre, etc.


"Half hours" is possible if it refers to multiple units of half an hour: "I have 10 half hours off every week".

 

[cuchuflete]

Things below are pretty confusing. pls Please tell me if I'm right. Thank you

I'd say something like this:
1.1 hours/meters, 0.87 hours/meters, 1/2 hours/meters

 

[mjscott]

things below are pretty confusing, pls tell me if i'm right, thank you

i'd say something like this:
1.1 hours/meters, 0.87 hours/meters, 1/2 hours/meters

1.1 hours (Hours are usually measured in quarter and half hours, or in minutes.)
1.1 meters
0.87 hours (See above.)
0.87 meters
1/2 hour
1/2 meter (Meters can also be halves, and sometimes quarters--but are usually expressed in decimals. Example: 0.5 meters)

 

[Matching Mole]

Hours may be measured in decimal fractions, for example in billing time (e.g. the legal profession where a unit of time is one tenth of an hour, and it is therefore convenient to refer to something like 0.7 hours in doing calculations).

 

[panjandrum]

Just to be clear:
As mjscott says, fractions of hours are usually expressed in other ways, but there is nothing incorrect about 1.1 hours or 0.87 hours.

 

[sb70012]

1.1 meters
0.87 meters
1/2 meter

This confuses me. Why are the first one and the second one plural but the third one (meter) is singular? Why isn't the third one singular too?