There is one country that has imposed a temporary travel ban on China because of the coronavirus, but one commenter online criticized the policy as null and void probably because he thinks that no one would want to go to China in this season anyway.
I think his comment is not only wrong, but he also used the wrong term because either of these is what he probably wanted to express:
The comment is wrong because if the ban did not exist, a few people would still dare to travel to and from China.
Do you agree?
I think his comment is not only wrong, but he also used the wrong term because either of these is what he probably wanted to express:
The travel ban is futile.
The travel ban is moot. (It should have been imposed earlier.)
The comment is wrong because if the ban did not exist, a few people would still dare to travel to and from China.
Do you agree?