For the normative unemphatic word order, I find Schmidt in ‘Urdu: An essential grammar’ p67 and p189 places adverbs in the following order:
Adverb of time, then adverb of place, then adverb of manner
and gives as an example:
Adverb of time, then adverb of manner, then adverb of place
and gives as an example:
So which is correct? And to what extent does it matter practically which is correct? How flesxible is the relative order of adverbs, both when they occur consecutively and when they don't? As Naim continues:
Adverb of time, then adverb of place, then adverb of manner
and gives as an example:
whereas I find Naim in ‘Introductory Urdu vol 1’ p153, p155 and p168 places them in the following order:āp kal yahāṁ zarūr āiyē
Please come here tomorrow without fail
Adverb of time, then adverb of manner, then adverb of place
and gives as an example:
"Ahmad will give Salim three books tomorrow, in Lahore, silently"ahmad saliim-koo kal laahaur-meeN xaamoosii-see tiin kitaabeeN deegaa”
So which is correct? And to what extent does it matter practically which is correct? How flesxible is the relative order of adverbs, both when they occur consecutively and when they don't? As Naim continues:
Would it sound unusual to instead say "laahaur-meeN kal ahmad saliim-koo xaamoosii-see tiin kitaabeeN deegaa"?That will be the normative order—but a most unlikely actual sentence. One is more likely to find these element arranged in several other different ways. For example:
/kal laahaur-meeN ahmad saliim-koo xaamoosii-see tiin kitaabeeN deegaa/