There is no common law (Anglo-Saxon) equivalent of usufructo -a legal concept of the civil law systems (Roman)-, which grants temporary right to use and enjoy the proceeds of another's property.
Some possible mistranslations: life estate; lifetime interest, beneficial interest, beneficial ownership, etc. (They may be incorrect in many contexts)
With that in mind, I suggest:
Usufruct of chattels, real property and/or agricultural facilities.
I concur with the statement: Anglo-Saxon law (during the Anglo-Saxon period between 450 and 1066 abouts) did not contain the concept of a “usufructo”. Such law was Germanic/Scandinavian in nature, and was not a “common law“, not judge made, by traditional definition.
The common law of England, (developed by judicial decisions, commencing with the King’s Court, after the Norman conquest) has very much replaced all vestiges of Anglo-Saxon law. (I recall the concept of Jury and certain Writs remain).
“Anglo-Saxon” defines an ethnicity, a medieval Germanic law, and not the common law of England.
Whether one can create the equivalent of a specifically defined “usufructo” by equivalent or nearly equivalent means, in law or equity, in Anglo-American law will depend on the facts of the usufructo in question.
