Sorry, I forgot to tell that the right answers according to my textbook is past simple for both. I wanted to know if there is any difference in usage of past simple and would when talking about repeating actions in the pastIt’s not wrong, even though the inconsistency of style does jar a bit. You can’t use would in the first sentence, because you’re not describing regular but separate events/actions, as you are in the second. However, you could use the simple past in the second sentence, to match the first. That would read more smoothly.
Neither of those verb forms in itself indicates that an action is habitual/regular. What does that is either the context or some kind of adverbial, or a combination of both.Sorry, I forgot to tell that the right answers according to my textbook is past simple for both. I wanted to know if there is any difference in usage of past simple and would when talking about repeating actions in the past