What are you here for, then?/What are you good for then?

[AidaGlass]

Hello.
I'm wondering if any of the sentences in italics is idiomatic. The customer wants to say "I expect you to help me carry the desk into my home. I believe it's your duty to help customers carry goods into their home."

The customer and the delivery driver are at the customer's door.
Customer: Now we need to move the desk into my home.
Delivery driver: Yeah, you need to find someone to help you with this. Is there anyone in your house who can help you carry the desk?
Customer: What are you here for, then?/What are you good for then?

 

[Uncle Jack]

"Good for" certainly does not fit, and "here for" is inappropriate since it is clear that the person is there to deliver the furniture, which they have just done. I think this is best dealt with using a direct question rather than a snide remark: "Aren't you going to help me then?" or "Can't you help me?"

 

[heypresto]

Both sound very rude to me. Why not ask 'Could you please help me carry it inside?'

Cross-posted.

 

[AidaGlass]

Thank you. Irregardless of being rude, are they acceptable?

 

[heypresto]

They are grammatically correct, but not, in my opinion, acceptable in this context.


Note 'irregardless' is not a word. It's 'regardless'.